toc In This Article expand_more
What Changed in GRE Analytical Writing (AWA)?
On the shorter GRE General Test, ETS permanently removed the "Analyze an Argument" essay. Your entire 0.0–6.0 Analytical Writing (AWA) score now comes from a single 30-minute "Analyze an Issue" task presented at the very beginning of your exam.
Every Issue prompt presents a broad philosophical, educational, policy, or technological claim followed by specific task instructions (for example, "Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take"). Both ETS human raters and the e-rater® automated scoring engine evaluate your essay on critical complexity, concrete evidence, organizational cohesion, and syntactic variety.
Why One-Sided "100% Agree" Essays Rarely Score Above 4.0
The official ETS scoring rubric for a Score 5.0 or 6.0 explicitly rewards essays that "consider the complexities of the issue" and address counterarguments or boundary conditions. If you write a simplistic five-paragraph essay that agrees 100% with the prompt in three repetitive paragraphs, your score is virtually capped at 4.0.
Instead, take a Qualified ("Yes, But..." or "Only Under Condition X") Thesis. Acknowledge where the prompt's claim holds merit, and then establish the precise conditions where it breaks down or causes unintended consequences.
The 30-Minute, 5-Paragraph 6.0 AWA Blueprint
| Paragraph & Timing | Target Word Count | Rhetorical Objective & Structure |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Writing Outline (Min 0–4) | Scratch Pad Notes | Define your nuanced thesis, pick 2 concrete historical/policy/scientific examples, and plan 1 concession paragraph. |
| Paragraph 1: Introduction (Min 4–8) | 75–95 words | Paraphrase the core tension of the prompt and state your qualified thesis clearly in the final sentence. |
| Paragraph 2: Core Supporting Pillar 1 (Min 8–14) | 110–130 words | Topic sentence + specific real-world example (e.g., regulatory policy, scientific R&D, public health) + causal analysis. |
| Paragraph 3: Core Supporting Pillar 2 (Min 14–20) | 110–130 words | Second distinct dimension (e.g., long-term vs. short-term impact, or individual vs. institutional scale) + concrete example. |
| Paragraph 4: Nuanced Concession & Boundary (Min 20–25) | 95–115 words | Begin with "Admittedly, proponents of the opposing view rightly note...", validate a reasonable exception, and show why your main thesis still prevails. |
| Paragraph 5: Conclusion & Proofread (Min 25–30) | 60–75 words | Synthesize the condition-based resolution (480–550 total words) and spend the final 2 minutes fixing typos and subject-verb agreement. |
How to Follow the Specific Task Instructions Word-for-Word
ETS pairs Issue prompts with one of six recurring instruction sets. If the instructions ask you to "discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree and address the most compelling reasons that could be used to challenge your position," Paragraph 4 (your counterargument/concession paragraph) is mandatory—skipping it directly lowers your rubric score.
“A 500-word essay with two deeply analyzed real-world examples and a sharp concession paragraph will outscore a rambling 700-word essay filled with vague generalizations every single time.”